The leadership of both parties must step up to condemn such hateful speech and demand apologies. The Obama campaign has criticized the lyrics, but we call on the presumptive party nominee, who is the celebrated subject of the new song, to go even further: It is not enough to condemn the song, we are calling on our presumptive Democratic Nominee to call on the artist and the label to pull the song and make a public apology. Now.
E-mail now. Send an e-mail to (http://www.defjam.com/site/contact.php) and demand that the song be pulled out of circulation and that Ludacris and his record label issue an apology.
Tell your friends. Forward this e-mail to everyone you know. We promised that we’d jump on these issues. But we need you to take it from here.
Join our movement. Sign up (http://www.womencountpac.com/Site/Welcome.html) and join our fight. Get involved in the direction the women’s movement is taking. Make sure that your voice is heard.
Showing posts with label rediculous. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rediculous. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
What Should Obama Do About Ludacris?
Women Count, in a letter to its members, demands action be taken against the rapper Ludacris and his label Def Jam for releasing a song with such offensive lyrics. They also call on both parties, and the Obama campaign demand the song be pulled from the shelves.
Labels:
obama celebrity,
obama star,
obnoxious,
petulent,
rediculous,
selfish,
slander,
vile,
women count
Saturday, February 23, 2008
NYT Attacks Giuliani and McCain
The few people that I have seen come to the defense of the NYT have stated that they didn't think it was fair to say that the article was written with the intent to undermine the Republican nominee. The fact that the NYT smeared Mayor Giuliani only a few months ago then burried a retraction in the back of their paper adds to this theory, and explicitly shows their lack of integrity and journalistic chops. Some have noted that this story is unifying conservatives, but I think it also needs to be noted that people across the political spectrum are coming to the defense of Senator McCain. This article is an affront to fair minded people of all political persuasions. The Times itself admits,
"Personally, I was surprised by the volume of the reaction (including more than 2,400 reader comments posted on our Web site). I was surprised by how lopsided the opinion was against our decision, with readers who described themselves as independents and Democrats joining Republicans in defending Mr. McCain from what they saw as a cheap shot."
The NYT has shown repeatedly that it lacks credibility and is more than willing to run unsubstantiated drivel to sell a paper. Just look at how their effect on the Giuliani campaign...
------
Relevant reading...
The New York Times Would Like to Hear From You
Why the Left and the Right Should be Upset About the NYT Story
------
From - http://blogs4mccain.com/
"Personally, I was surprised by the volume of the reaction (including more than 2,400 reader comments posted on our Web site). I was surprised by how lopsided the opinion was against our decision, with readers who described themselves as independents and Democrats joining Republicans in defending Mr. McCain from what they saw as a cheap shot."
The NYT has shown repeatedly that it lacks credibility and is more than willing to run unsubstantiated drivel to sell a paper. Just look at how their effect on the Giuliani campaign...
------
Relevant reading...
The New York Times Would Like to Hear From You
Why the Left and the Right Should be Upset About the NYT Story
------
From - http://blogs4mccain.com/
Labels:
2008,
blog articles,
center,
critic,
criticism,
decision,
giuliani,
john mccain,
left,
media source,
moderates,
presidential race,
red state,
rediculous,
right,
rudy,
senator mccain
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)